Identity and access control, encryption and key management, threat detection, and compliance tooling.

Amazon Cognito

Managed authentication and authorization for your app's users — sign-up, sign-in, and temporary AWS credentials.

  • User Pools = authentication (who are you) — a user directory that handles sign-up, sign-in, MFA, and returns JWT tokens
  • Identity Pools = authorization (what can you access) — swaps an identity for temporary AWS credentials via STS, including unauthenticated guest access
  • Federation: sign in with Google, Facebook, Apple, Amazon, or corporate SAML 2.0 / OIDC providers — Cognito is the broker so your app only speaks one token format
  • For app users (customers), not workforce — employees logging into AWS itself is IAM Identity Center, not Cognito

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Sign-up / sign-in for a web or mobile app", "user directory", "social login" → User Pools
  • "App users need direct access to S3 / DynamoDB", "temporary AWS credentials", "guest access" → Identity Pools
  • "Millions of users" + "minimal operational overhead" for auth → Cognito over building on EC2/DynamoDB
  • "MFA", "adaptive authentication", "compromised credential detection" for app users → Cognito threat protection

Not this service

  • Workforce/employee SSO into AWS accounts and business apps → IAM Identity Center
  • Service-to-service or AWS-resource permissions without human users → IAM roles/policies
  • Managed Microsoft AD or domain-joined workloads → AWS Directory Service

Use cases

  • Mobile app login: think hotel front desk (User Pool checks you in and hands you a keycard/JWT) vs. the keycard itself opening specific doors (Identity Pool grants scoped AWS access)
  • Photo-sharing app where each signed-in user uploads directly to their own S3 prefix — Identity Pool issues per-user temporary credentials, no backend proxy needed
  • SaaS product offering "Continue with Google" alongside email/password, with one consistent token your API validates regardless of how the user signed in
  • B2B app where enterprise customers demand login via their own corporate IdP — federate their SAML provider into your User Pool without rebuilding auth per customer
  • Guest mode: let unauthenticated users browse with read-only AWS access via Identity Pools, then upgrade to full access after sign-up

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-28

Amazon Detective

Security investigation service that builds a behavior graph from your logs so you can trace a finding back to its root cause.

  • Answers "what happened and why" AFTER a finding exists — GuardDuty detects, Detective investigates
  • Auto-ingests CloudTrail, VPC Flow Logs, EKS audit logs, GuardDuty findings, and Security Hub findings — no pipelines, no queries to write
  • Uses ML, statistical analysis, and graph theory to build a behavior graph linking accounts, resources, and IP addresses over time
  • Retains up to 1 year of aggregated data for analysis
  • Prerequisite: GuardDuty must be enabled at least 48 hours before enabling Detective

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Root cause analysis" of a security finding → Detective
  • "Investigate" or "analyze" suspicious activity across accounts and time → Detective
  • "Visualize relationships" between resources, users, and IPs during an incident → behavior graph
  • Detect vs. investigate distinction: GuardDuty raises the alarm, Detective works the case

Not this service

  • Detecting threats in the first place → GuardDuty
  • Aggregating findings and compliance posture in one dashboard → Security Hub
  • Scanning EC2/containers for software vulnerabilities → Inspector
  • Finding sensitive data in S3 → Macie

Use cases

  • An engineer's access key shows up in a GuardDuty finding — Detective's behavior graph shows every API call, resource touched, and IP involved, so you know if it was a leaked key or the engineer on hotel Wi-Fi
  • Tracing a compromised EC2 instance backwards: which role launched it, what it talked to, and whether the traffic pattern is new or normal for that instance
  • Post-incident scoping across an AWS Organization — one behavior graph over member accounts instead of grepping CloudTrail in each one
  • Deciding if a spike in failed logins is an attack or a misconfigured cron job, by comparing against up to a year of baseline behavior

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-26

Amazon GuardDuty

Managed threat detection that continuously analyzes account and network activity for malicious behavior — no agents, no rules to write.

  • Foundational sources: CloudTrail management events, VPC Flow Logs, DNS query logs — analyzed directly by GuardDuty, you don't need to enable or pay for those logs separately
  • Detects with threat intelligence feeds + ML anomaly detection: compromised credentials, crypto mining, unusual API calls, C2 traffic
  • Optional protection plans bolt on per source: S3, EKS, RDS, Lambda, Runtime Monitoring, Malware Protection — toggle independently; foundational detection can't be disabled while GuardDuty is on
  • Regional service — enable per Region; org-wide rollout via AWS Organizations with a delegated administrator account
  • Findings are read-only detections routed to EventBridge / Security Hub — GuardDuty detects, it never blocks or remediates by itself

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Continuously monitor for malicious activity / compromised instances / unusual API calls" → GuardDuty
  • "Threat detection with no agents or infrastructure to manage" → GuardDuty
  • "EC2 instance mining cryptocurrency" or "credentials used from an unusual location" → classic GuardDuty finding scenarios
  • "Automatically respond to a finding" → GuardDuty finding → EventBridge rule → Lambda/SNS (GuardDuty itself takes no action)

Not this service

  • Scanning workloads for software vulnerabilities/CVEs → Inspector
  • Discovering sensitive data (PII) in S3 → Macie
  • Deep-dive investigation of a finding's root cause → Detective
  • Aggregating security findings across services into one dashboard → Security Hub

Use cases

  • A leaked access key starts making API calls from an IP range your team has never touched — GuardDuty flags the anomaly before the bill does
  • An EC2 instance quietly joins a mining pool at 2 a.m.; the crypto-mining finding fires into EventBridge and a Lambda isolates the instance's security group
  • Fresh AWS Organization with 40 accounts: one delegated admin enables GuardDuty everywhere in minutes — the fastest path to baseline threat visibility without deploying anything
  • Compliance requires continuous threat monitoring evidence; GuardDuty findings piped to Security Hub become the audit trail

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-26

Amazon Inspector

Automated, continuous vulnerability scanning for EC2 instances, ECR container images, and Lambda functions.

  • Continuous, not scheduled — new instances, pushed images, and deployed functions are discovered and scanned automatically, then rescanned when new CVEs drop
  • Scans three resource types: EC2 (via SSM Agent or agentless EBS-snapshot scanning), ECR images (enhanced scanning), Lambda functions and layers
  • Finds two problem classes: software vulnerabilities (CVEs in OS and language packages) and unintended network exposure
  • Each finding gets a risk score contextualized by environment — an internet-reachable vulnerable instance ranks above the same CVE on a private one
  • Organization-wide: enable once via delegated admin, findings roll up to Security Hub

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Software vulnerabilities", "CVEs", "unpatched packages" on EC2 or containers → Inspector
  • "Continuously scan container images in ECR" → Inspector enhanced scanning
  • "Network reachability" / "unintended network exposure" assessment → Inspector
  • Automated security assessment of workloads (not accounts, not data) → Inspector

Not this service

  • Threat detection from logs/behavior (compromised credentials, crypto mining) → GuardDuty
  • Finding sensitive data (PII) in S3 → Macie
  • Aggregating findings across security services → Security Hub
  • Account-level best-practice checks (open ports in SGs, IAM hygiene) → Trusted Advisor

Use cases

  • A log4j-style zero-day lands overnight — Inspector rescans your whole fleet against the new CVE and surfaces every affected instance and image by morning, no scan jobs to kick off
  • CI/CD pushes a container image to ECR and it's scanned on push, so a vulnerable base layer is flagged before the deploy pipeline promotes it
  • A team quietly launches EC2 instances for a side project — Inspector auto-discovers them and they show up in findings without security ever knowing the instances existed
  • Compliance audit asks 'how do you manage vulnerabilities?' — continuous scanning plus Security Hub findings history is the evidence trail

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-26

Amazon Macie

Managed service that discovers sensitive data in Amazon S3 and flags risky bucket configurations.

  • Amazon S3 only — general purpose buckets; nothing for RDS, EBS, DynamoDB, or EFS
  • Two discovery modes: automated (daily sampling, sensitivity score per bucket) and discovery jobs (targeted, one-time or scheduled)
  • Detects using managed data identifiers (PII, financial, credentials) plus custom regex identifiers; allow lists suppress known-safe matches
  • Two finding types: policy (bucket public, unencrypted, shared outside the org) and sensitive data (what's inside the object)
  • Limits: findings and discovery results kept 90 days, 10,000 buckets inventoried per account, 15 detection locations per finding, regional — enable per Region

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Discover PII", "find credit card numbers", "detect credentials" in S3 → Macie
  • "GDPR / HIPAA / PCI-DSS" + "where does our sensitive data live" → Macie, not Config
  • Alert when a bucket holding customer data becomes public → Macie policy finding → EventBridge → Lambda
  • Sensitive data sitting outside S3 → export it to S3 first, then Macie

Not this service

  • Threat detection from CloudTrail, VPC Flow, or DNS logs → GuardDuty
  • Resource configuration drift and compliance rules → AWS Config
  • OS, package, and CVE scanning for EC2/ECR/Lambda → Inspector
  • Redacting PII from text at request time → Comprehend

Use cases

  • Pre-handoff audit — scan a legacy bucket before shipping the data dump to a partner, so you find out you're exporting customer PII before they do
  • Credential leak sweep — dev exports, CloudFormation outputs, and .env backups that a CI job quietly pushed to S3
  • Data lake landing zone guardrail — a scheduled job on the raw ingest prefix so a new upstream feed can't silently start writing SSNs into the lake
  • Inherited-account triage — enable Macie org-wide after an acquisition and use bucket sensitivity scores to decide which of 400 unknown buckets to open first
  • Automated containment — policy finding on a bucket going public routes through EventBridge to a Lambda that re-applies Block Public Access and pages the owner

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-24

AWS Certificate Manager

Provisions, manages, and auto-renews SSL/TLS certificates for AWS services.

  • Public certificates for ACM-integrated services (ALB, CloudFront, API Gateway) are free — you never touch the private key
  • DNS validation → auto-renewal forever; email validation → someone must click a link before expiry, or the cert lapses
  • Regional service: the cert must live in the same Region as the resource using it — except CloudFront, which only reads certs from us-east-1
  • Limits: 2,500 certs per Region per account, 10 domain names per cert (raisable to 100), wildcard covers one subdomain level only (*.example.com, not a.b.example.com)

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "HTTPS on the load balancer / CloudFront / API Gateway" → ACM public cert, free
  • "Certificate expired and the site went down" → email validation was used; switch to DNS validation for auto-renewal
  • "Custom domain on CloudFront" → cert must be requested in us-east-1, regardless of where anything else lives
  • "TLS on an EC2 instance directly" → exam convention: ACM public certs can't be exported, so use a third-party cert or Private CA. Reality since June 2025: exportable public certs exist, but they're paid — expect the exam to lag here

Not this service

  • Certificates for internal-only apps and devices with your own CA hierarchy → AWS Private CA
  • Storing arbitrary secrets, API keys, or database credentials → Secrets Manager

Use cases

  • Terminating HTTPS at an ALB fronting a fleet of instances — traffic is encrypted to the edge, plain HTTP inside the VPC, and nobody ever files a renewal ticket again
  • One wildcard cert (*.shop.example) covering every tenant subdomain of a SaaS storefront, attached to a single ALB listener
  • CloudFront distribution with a custom domain — the one architecture where the us-east-1 rule bites teams deploying everything in ap-southeast-1
  • Killing the annual 2 a.m. outage caused by a certificate someone bought manually three years ago and forgot about — DNS-validated ACM certs renew themselves

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-27

AWS CloudHSM

Dedicated, single-tenant hardware security modules in your VPC — you own the keys, AWS can't touch them.

  • Single-tenant hardware in your VPC — FIPS 140-3 Level 3 validated (hsm2m.medium); older hsm1.medium is deprecated
  • You control keys end-to-end: AWS has zero visibility and zero recovery — lose your crypto credentials and the keys are gone forever
  • Cluster of 1–28 HSMs; HA is YOUR job — run at least 2 HSMs across 2 AZs, keys sync automatically within the cluster
  • Talks industry-standard APIs: PKCS#11, JCE (Java), CNG/KSP (Windows) — apps integrate directly, not via AWS APIs
  • Can back KMS as a custom key store when you need KMS integration but keys must live in dedicated hardware

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "FIPS 140-3 Level 3" or "dedicated/single-tenant hardware" → CloudHSM, not KMS
  • "Contractual or regulatory requirement that AWS must have no access to keys"
  • Migrating an on-prem HSM workload (PKCS#11 app, Oracle TDE, SSL/TLS offload) to AWS
  • "Full control over key hierarchy, algorithms, and key export" — KMS keys can't leave KMS, CloudHSM keys can

Not this service

  • Managed encryption integrated with AWS services (S3, EBS, RDS) → KMS
  • Storing/rotating passwords, API keys, DB credentials → Secrets Manager
  • Payment PIN/card workloads → AWS Payment Cryptography

Use cases

  • A bank's contract says the cloud provider must never be able to read signing keys — CloudHSM's tamper-resistant hardware makes that a hardware guarantee, not a policy promise
  • Lifting an on-prem PKCS#11 application (document signing, certificate authority) to AWS without rewriting its crypto layer
  • Oracle database TDE where the compliance team requires master keys in a dedicated HSM, not shared infrastructure
  • KMS custom key store: keep the convenience of KMS envelope encryption while auditors get their dedicated-hardware checkbox
  • Monthly code-signing ceremony: spin HSMs up from backup, sign, delete them — pay only for the hours used

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-27

AWS Directory Service

Managed Microsoft Active Directory options in AWS — run a real AD in the cloud, or proxy to the one you already have.

  • Three flavors: AWS Managed Microsoft AD (real Windows AD in AWS), AD Connector (proxy to on-prem AD, caches nothing), Simple AD (cheap Samba-based AD-compatible)
  • Managed Microsoft AD: actual Windows Server AD, two DCs across two AZs, supports trusts, MFA, schema extensions, seamless EC2 domain join, RDS for SQL Server
  • Managed Microsoft AD editions: Standard (~30,000 objects) vs Enterprise (~500,000 objects + multi-Region replication)
  • AD Connector: identities stay on-prem, needs VPN or Direct Connect back to your AD — no trusts, no standalone directory
  • Simple AD: ≤5,000 users, no trusts, no MFA — and AWS closed it to new customers, though exams still treat it as a live option

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Existing on-premises AD" + "don't want directory data in the cloud" → AD Connector
  • "AD-aware workloads on AWS" (SharePoint, SQL Server, .NET) or "trust relationship with on-prem AD" → AWS Managed Microsoft AD
  • "Lowest cost", "basic AD features", "under 5,000 users", no trust/MFA needs → Simple AD
  • MFA with corporate credentials for WorkSpaces/AWS apps → Managed Microsoft AD or AD Connector (RADIUS), never Simple AD

Not this service

  • Single sign-on into AWS accounts and SaaS apps → IAM Identity Center (it can *use* Directory Service as its identity source, but it's the SSO layer, not the directory)
  • Sign-up/sign-in for your own web or mobile app's customers → Amazon Cognito
  • Fine-grained permissions to AWS APIs and resources → IAM

Use cases

  • Lifting SharePoint or a legacy .NET intranet into AWS without rebuilding auth — Managed Microsoft AD gives it the same domain it had in the server room
  • A company rolling out WorkSpaces for 2,000 staff who already log in via corporate AD — AD Connector lets them keep one password and zero cloud-side directory
  • Joining fleets of EC2 Windows instances to a domain so group policies apply the moment they boot, instead of hand-configuring each box
  • Two-way trust between on-prem AD and Managed Microsoft AD, so cloud resources authenticate corporate users without migrating or syncing a single account
  • Enabling Windows Authentication on RDS for SQL Server — one of the exam's favorite Managed-Microsoft-AD-only tricks

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-28

AWS Firewall Manager

Central control plane that pushes firewall and DDoS protections across every account in your organization.

  • Not a firewall itself — it deploys and enforces WAF, Shield Advanced, Network Firewall, DNS Firewall, security groups and NACLs
  • Prerequisites: AWS Organizations with all features, a designated Firewall Manager admin account, AWS Config on in every account
  • Policies auto-apply to new accounts and new resources in scope — scope by account, OU, resource type, or tag
  • Policies are per-Region (CloudFront uses Global); audit mode reports violations, remediation mode fixes them automatically

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Centrally", "across all accounts", "organization-wide" + firewall or DDoS → Firewall Manager
  • Protection must apply automatically to accounts and resources created in the future
  • Find and fix security groups left open to 0.0.0.0/0 across the whole org
  • Turn on Shield Advanced for every account in the organization in one action

Not this service

  • Writing rules for one app in one account → AWS WAF, Shield, or Network Firewall directly
  • Org-wide compliance across all resource types, not just firewalls → AWS Config + Security Hub

Use cases

  • A security team with 40 accounts wants every internet-facing ALB behind the same managed rule baseline — without asking 40 app teams to do it
  • New accounts get spun up weekly by different teams; the WAF and DNS Firewall policies land the moment an account joins the OU
  • Auditing every security group for SSH open to the internet in report-only mode first, then flipping the same policy to auto-remediate
  • Rolling Shield Advanced across all production accounts ahead of a launch, instead of subscribing resources one at a time
  • Letting app teams add their own WAF rules in the middle of a web ACL while the security team's rules stay pinned first and last

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-09-09

AWS IAM

Global service controlling who (identities) can do what (policies) on which AWS resources.

  • Global, not regional — users, roles, and policies exist once per account and apply everywhere
  • Identities: users (people), groups (bundles of users), roles (temporary credentials assumed by anyone/anything)
  • Policies are JSON documents; evaluation rule: explicit deny > explicit allow > implicit deny (default)
  • Roles > access keys — services (EC2, Lambda) assume roles for temporary credentials, never store keys on instances
  • Root user: full unrestricted access; lock it down with MFA and never use it for daily work

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Grant EC2/Lambda access to S3" → IAM role attached to the service, never access keys in code
  • "Cross-account access" → role in the target account, trust policy allowing the source account to assume it
  • "Temporary credentials" or "federated access" → roles via STS, not new IAM users
  • "Least privilege" → start from nothing, grant only required actions
  • "Enforce MFA" / "password policy" → IAM account settings, condition keys like aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent

Not this service

  • Workforce SSO across many accounts → IAM Identity Center
  • Customer-facing app sign-ups and logins → Amazon Cognito
  • Managed Microsoft AD → AWS Directory Service

Use cases

  • A deploy pipeline assumes a short-lived role to push to production instead of a shared 'ci-user' with permanent keys sitting in a config file
  • A reporting Lambda in the analytics account assumes a read-only role in the production account to pull billing data — cross-account without credential sharing
  • New hires land in a 'developers' group and instantly inherit the team's permissions; offboarding is one group removal, not a policy audit
  • An EC2 instance profile grants a web server write access to exactly one S3 bucket — a leaked server can't touch anything else
  • Permissions boundary on a sandbox role lets junior engineers create resources freely but caps what any role they create can ever do

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-27

AWS IAM Identity Center

Centralized workforce sign-on: one login, one identity source, access to all AWS accounts and apps in your organization.

  • Formerly AWS SSO (renamed 2022) — CLI commands, API namespaces, and console URLs still say `sso`
  • Deployed in the AWS Organizations management account; permission sets are provisioned into member accounts as IAM roles
  • Identity source options: built-in directory, Active Directory, or external IdP (Entra ID, Okta) via SAML 2.0 + SCIM sync — one identity source per organization
  • Users sign in once at the AWS access portal and see every account and app assigned to them

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Single sign-on across multiple AWS accounts" → Identity Center, not IAM users per account
  • "Centrally manage workforce access" with AWS Organizations in the question → Identity Center
  • "Connect existing corporate directory / Active Directory for AWS access" → Identity Center with AD or external IdP
  • "Temporary credentials, no long-lived access keys for employees" → Identity Center permission sets

Not this service

  • Customer-facing app logins (sign-up/sign-in for your users) → Amazon Cognito
  • Fine-grained policies, roles, and service permissions inside one account → IAM
  • Running an actual Microsoft AD in the cloud → AWS Directory Service

Use cases

  • New hire joins the platform team: add them to one group in your IdP, and SCIM sync plus group assignments give them dev access in three accounts by lunch — no per-account IAM user creation
  • Replacing the spreadsheet of shared IAM access keys: everyone signs in through the access portal and gets short-lived credentials, so offboarding is deleting one user, not hunting keys across 12 accounts
  • Standardizing job-function access: define an 'auditor' permission set once, provision it to every account, and every auditor gets identical read-only access everywhere
  • CLI and IDE access without stored keys: `aws configure sso` gives engineers temporary credentials tied to their real identity, so CloudTrail shows who did what
  • One federation point for AWS managed apps (Amazon Q Developer, Redshift, QuickSight) instead of wiring your IdP to each app separately

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-28

AWS KMS

Managed service for creating and controlling encryption keys used across AWS services and your own apps.

  • Keys never leave KMS unencrypted — you send data to the key, not the key to your data
  • Direct Encrypt/Decrypt caps at 4 KB; anything bigger uses envelope encryption (KMS encrypts a data key, the data key encrypts your data)
  • Three key types: AWS owned (invisible, free), AWS managed (aws/service, free storage), customer managed (you control policy, rotation, deletion)
  • Regional service — keys don't cross Regions; multi-region keys are replicas billed separately
  • Deletion is never instant: 7–30 day mandatory waiting period, and a deleted key means permanently unreadable data
  • Every key use is logged in CloudTrail — this is the audit answer, not an add-on

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Encryption at rest", "manage encryption keys", "control who can decrypt" → KMS
  • "Encrypt data larger than 4 KB" → envelope encryption with data keys, not direct Encrypt
  • "Audit key usage" → KMS + CloudTrail
  • Compliance requires customer-controlled keys → customer managed key, not AWS managed
  • "Dedicated single-tenant hardware" / FIPS 140-2 Level 3 → CloudHSM (or KMS custom key store), not plain KMS

Not this service

  • Storing/rotating database passwords or API keys → Secrets Manager
  • Dedicated single-tenant HSM you fully control → CloudHSM
  • SSL/TLS certificates for load balancers and CloudFront → ACM

Use cases

  • One customer managed key per environment (prod/staging) so a leaked staging credential can never decrypt production S3 objects
  • Cross-account key policy letting an analytics account decrypt a data lake bucket without copying data or sharing credentials
  • Envelope encryption in an app storing signed contracts — KMS wraps one data key per document, so revoking the KMS key revokes everything at once
  • Meeting an auditor's 'prove who decrypted customer records and when' requirement purely from CloudTrail KMS events
  • Disabling (not deleting) a key during an incident to instantly cut off all decryption while keeping the option to recover

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-27

AWS Resource Access Manager

Share resources you own with other AWS accounts instead of building a copy in each one.

  • Create once, share many — the owning account keeps full ownership and control, consumers just get access
  • A resource share = the resources + the principals (accounts, OUs, whole org, some IAM roles/users) + a managed permission
  • Inside your organization sharing is automatic once enabled; outside it, the other account must accept an invitation
  • Limits: shares are Region-scoped (global resources live in us-east-1); subnets share only inside your own org, and default subnets can't be shared at all

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Share across accounts", "without duplicating resources", "centrally managed", "create once, use everywhere"
  • Many accounts need to launch into one central VPC → RAM-shared subnets, not a VPC per account
  • One Transit Gateway, Resolver rule, or private CA used org-wide → RAM
  • Sharing with an account outside the organization → invitation must be accepted first

Not this service

  • Grouping accounts, consolidated billing, SCP guardrails → AWS Organizations
  • Letting a person or app in another account act with your permissions → IAM cross-account role + STS

Use cases

  • A central networking account owns the VPC and shares subnets — each app team launches EC2, RDS, and Lambda from their own account into one VPC the network team patches once
  • One Transit Gateway shared org-wide, so a brand-new account gets on-prem and inter-VPC connectivity on day one without its own VPN or Direct Connect
  • Route 53 Resolver rules shared from a DNS account, so every account resolves internal hostnames the same way instead of each keeping a copy that quietly drifts
  • A private CA in the security account shared to app accounts, so teams issue their own internal TLS certs without anyone passing around root key access
  • EC2 Capacity Reservations or Dedicated Hosts bought in one account and shared, so whichever team needs the capacity this week can actually launch into it

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-09-09

AWS Secrets Manager

Managed storage and automatic rotation for credentials, API keys, and other secrets.

  • Secrets encrypted at rest with KMS (default aws/secretsmanager key or your own CMK) — never stored or returned in plaintext at rest
  • Automatic rotation via Lambda; managed rotation templates exist for RDS, Redshift, and DocumentDB — anything else needs a custom rotation function
  • Versioning with staging labels (AWSCURRENT / AWSPENDING / AWSPREVIOUS) so apps never read a half-rotated credential
  • Limits: 64 KB max secret size, 500,000 secrets per Region per account, cross-Region replication supported

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Automatic rotation", "rotate database credentials" → Secrets Manager, full stop — Parameter Store can't rotate natively
  • "Hardcoded credentials in code / config files" → move them to Secrets Manager, retrieve at runtime via IAM
  • "Share credentials across accounts" → Secrets Manager resource policy + KMS CMK (the default key can't cross accounts)
  • Free option acceptable + no rotation needed → Parameter Store Standard tier, not Secrets Manager

Not this service

  • Static config values, feature flags, plain parameters → SSM Parameter Store (Standard tier is free)
  • Managing the encryption keys themselves → KMS
  • Certificates for load balancers / CloudFront → ACM

Use cases

  • Rotating an RDS password every 30 days without a deploy — the app fetches the secret at runtime, so the credential changes and nothing ships
  • Killing the .env file: a Lambda or ECS task pulls its third-party API keys at startup via IAM role instead of baked-in environment secrets
  • One database secret shared by staging services across two accounts through a resource policy, instead of copy-pasting the password into both
  • Cross-Region replication of secrets so a DR failover in the second Region starts with working credentials, not a manual re-entry step
  • Storing a full DB connection bundle (host, port, user, password) as one JSON secret so rotation updates everything atomically

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-27

AWS Security Hub

Central dashboard that aggregates security findings from AWS services and runs automated compliance checks against security standards.

  • Aggregator, not a detector — it collects findings from GuardDuty, Inspector, Macie, and partner tools into one place
  • Runs continuous automated checks against standards: AWS Foundational Security Best Practices, CIS, PCI DSS, NIST
  • All findings normalized into one JSON schema: AWS Security Finding Format (ASFF)
  • Regional service — enable per Region, but a designated aggregation Region can consolidate cross-Region and cross-account (Organizations) findings
  • Requires AWS Config running — security checks are built on Config's recorded resource state
  • Naming update: AWS now calls this 'Security Hub CSPM'; exams still say 'Security Hub'

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Single pane of glass" / "centralize security findings across accounts" → Security Hub
  • "Check compliance against CIS / PCI DSS benchmarks automatically" → Security Hub standards
  • Automated remediation of findings → Security Hub + EventBridge + Lambda/SSM Automation
  • Aggregate GuardDuty + Inspector + Macie results → Security Hub, not any single one of them

Not this service

  • Detect actual threats (malware, compromised credentials, crypto mining) → GuardDuty
  • Scan EC2/containers for software vulnerabilities → Inspector
  • Find sensitive data in S3 → Macie
  • Audit who did what via API history → CloudTrail
  • Central security incident investigation across accounts → Detective

Use cases

  • A company with 40 accounts in Organizations pipes every GuardDuty and Inspector finding into one delegated admin account, so the two-person security team stops logging into accounts one by one
  • Proving PCI DSS posture to an auditor with a live compliance score per control instead of a quarterly spreadsheet exercise
  • Auto-remediation loop: a public S3 bucket finding fires an EventBridge rule that triggers a Lambda to block public access and post to Slack — no human in the path
  • New-account guardrail: every account vended by the platform team gets Security Hub + FSBP standard enabled by default, so misconfigurations surface on day one, not at audit time

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-26

AWS Shield

Managed DDoS protection for AWS applications — Standard is free and always on, Advanced is a paid subscription with expert support.

  • Standard: free, automatic, every AWS customer — nothing to enable, defends layer 3/4 (network and transport) attacks
  • Advanced: paid subscription — adds layer 7 (application) protection via AWS WAF, 24/7 Shield Response Team, and DDoS cost protection
  • Advanced protects a fixed list: CloudFront, Route 53, Global Accelerator, ELB, and EC2 — that's the whole list
  • SRT engagement requires a Business or Enterprise Support plan on top of the Advanced subscription
  • Reality check: AWS now markets Shield as two capabilities — Shield Advanced and network security director (posture analysis, still in preview). CLF-C02 only tests Standard vs. Advanced.

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "DDoS", "flood of traffic", "layer 3/4 attack", "protect availability" → Shield
  • "Already included", "no additional cost", "automatic" → Shield Standard (Advanced is the trap answer)
  • "24/7 expert help during an attack" or "credits for attack-driven scaling costs" → Shield Advanced
  • SQL injection, XSS, bad bots, block by IP or country → AWS WAF, not Shield

Not this service

  • Blocking malicious request content — SQLi, XSS, rate limiting → AWS WAF
  • Detecting compromised instances or unusual API activity → GuardDuty
  • Filtering traffic inside your VPC at subnet or instance level → security groups, NACLs, Network Firewall

Use cases

  • A ticketing site on sale day — Standard already absorbs SYN floods and reflection attacks at the edge, and nobody on the team ever knew it happened
  • A gaming company whose tournament weekends attract paid DDoS-for-hire from rivals — Advanced with the SRT pre-authorized and on standby
  • A lender behind CloudFront + WAF hit by a layer 7 flood of expensive search queries, where the damage lands on Lambda and RDS bills rather than bandwidth — Advanced's automatic L7 mitigation
  • A news site during a breaking story, where a legitimate traffic spike and an attack look identical — Advanced's attack diagnostics tell you which one you're having before you scale into it
  • Any public endpoint fronted by Auto Scaling — Advanced's cost protection is the difference between a bad afternoon and a five-figure surprise invoice

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-09-09

AWS STS

Issues temporary, limited-privilege credentials so nobody has to hold long-term keys.

  • Returns three things: access key ID, secret access key, session token — all requests using them must include the session token
  • AssumeRole: default 1 hour, up to 12 hours depending on the role's max session duration setting
  • Role chaining (assumed role assumes another role) is hard-capped at 1 hour — not configurable
  • Once issued, credentials cannot be revoked — but permissions are re-evaluated on every request, so changing the role's policy effectively cuts them off
  • Global endpoint (sts.amazonaws.com) by default; regional endpoints exist and AWS recommends them for lower latency and resilience
  • Temporary access keys start with ASIA; long-term IAM user keys start with AKIA

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "Temporary credentials", "short-lived access", "no long-term keys" → STS
  • Cross-account access → role in target account + AssumeRole, never a duplicate IAM user
  • Corporate directory / SAML login to AWS → AssumeRoleWithSAML
  • Mobile app users via Google/Facebook/Cognito → AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity
  • Third party assuming a role in your account → require ExternalId (confused deputy defense)
  • "Who am I authenticated as?" in a script → GetCallerIdentity

Not this service

  • Defining users, roles, and policies themselves → IAM (STS only vends credentials against them)
  • Full user directory with sign-up/sign-in for your app → Amazon Cognito
  • Centralized workforce access across many accounts → IAM Identity Center

Use cases

  • Cross-account access: an auditor or partner assumes a role in your account instead of you creating and babysitting an IAM user for them — like a visitor badge that expires at the end of the day
  • CI/CD pipelines (Jenkins, GitHub Actions) assuming a deploy role per run, so no permanent keys sit in pipeline config waiting to leak
  • EC2 instance profiles, ECS task roles, and Lambda execution roles — all of these are STS under the hood, auto-refreshing credentials so your code never touches a key file
  • Federating an existing corporate directory into AWS via SAML, so employees use one login and zero IAM users get created
  • MFA-protected CLI sessions: GetSessionToken with an MFA code before sensitive operations

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-08-28

AWS WAF

Layer 7 firewall that inspects and filters HTTP(S) requests before they reach CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway.

  • A web ACL holds your rules, evaluated in priority order — first match wins, and a default action (allow or block) catches everything else
  • Attaches to CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway REST, AppSync, Cognito user pools, App Runner, Amplify, Verified Access — never directly to an EC2 instance
  • AWS Managed Rules cover the common attacks out of the box (SQLi, XSS, known-bad inputs, bad IP reputation) — writing rules from scratch is the exception
  • Rate-based rules count requests per IP over a 1- or 5-minute window; Count mode lets you dry-run a rule in production before it blocks anyone
  • Naming note: the new AWS WAF console calls a web ACL a "protection pack" — the exam still says web ACL

Exam triggers

Phrases and scenarios that point here.

  • "SQL injection", "cross-site scripting", "OWASP Top 10", "common web exploits" → WAF
  • "Block requests from specific countries or IP ranges" → WAF geo-match rule or IP set
  • "Layer 7", "HTTP flood", "filter requests before they reach the application" → WAF, not Shield and not security groups
  • "Throttle requests to the login page" / "limit requests per IP" → rate-based rule

Not this service

  • Network/transport layer (L3/L4) DDoS protection → Shield (Standard is automatic and free; Advanced adds the response team and cost protection)
  • Filtering by IP and port at the instance or subnet level → security groups and network ACLs
  • Inspecting all VPC traffic, not just HTTP → Network Firewall
  • Pushing one firewall policy across every account and every new resource → Firewall Manager

Use cases

  • Shielding a legacy app you can't safely patch — WAF blocks SQLi and XSS at the edge while the real fix works its way through the release cycle
  • Geo-blocking for a regional business: a store that only ships to two countries drops everything else at CloudFront, shrinking both attack surface and origin load
  • Rate-limiting login and password-reset endpoints so credential-stuffing bots get throttled per IP without a single line of application code changing
  • Stopping competitor scraping on a listings site (jobs, property, tickets) — Bot Control plus a CAPTCHA action on the search endpoint
  • Incident response: add an IP set to the existing web ACL and block a hostile range in minutes, no deployment required

Commonly confused with

Full notes →

Verified against AWS documentation · 2026-09-09